Merry Christmas
The holy day when Jesus Christ - may eternal blessings be upon his eternally blessed soul - came into this world is an idea that transcends time and space, it’s an idea that cannot be surpassed except by God, the One, who has given the gift of curious choices; the appearance of the Rabbi represented the attribute of God’s Love manifested real, pure love, the idea of the sacrifice in honor of being loved, its the essence of the Holy Tanakh in the context of the enslaved Hebrews who were saved because, despite the tremendous ego that comes with being the elect (I can only imagine how I’d feel), they revered the law as a result of being bound to it, those who acknowledge the truth of laws struggle in that direction - to follow a set of rules - that will result in balance, not tipping the board in anyone’s favor which is when nature attempts to stabilize itself, human beings are a circumstantial entity that can be removed and replaced - not a controversial idea in the context of survival - a fully aware conscious agent feels being tipped and reason takes the lead in establishing harmony, democracy as an example of a system that can be easily tipped however its also the easiest to rebalance when reason is applied at the local level - the root that allows the growth of something good, or knot. Laws are the invisible pillars that support the entirety of existence, without laws, there is only a meaningless quantum haze that defines nothing and has no meaning, the absurd ones stating all is an illusion whilst at the very same time negating the thing having the illusion as an illusion also. The birth of Jesus Christ, as an idea, presents a standard of love that is unachievable, except by those who understand the function of a finite moment that asks a simple question, is the truth of love enough, or will the infatuation on a material abstraction, created to construct meaning in a society made up conscious agents who’s nature is absolutely unique, where the social construct takes a form of truth that exists in the imagination of the one who chooses to be fixated on a truth that is substandard to the actual truth. Love is a social construct that exists only because it has a firm idea associated with it, that is commonly shared across any conscious agent that can feel, and the highest ideal of love is to be of service and the idea of sacrifice emerges to determine if the system of moral law is functioning to protect or not. Laws are tested to determine if the laws stand true both in the context of saving the innocent - to whom the law applies - or demonstrating the resulting chaos if the laws are ignored in place of momentary social constructs that exist to divide, sub-divide, and usher in compartments that have no meaning in the context of the whole.
If social constructs are an illusion made up by people and then, at the same time, people anchor to a specific definition of a social construct in the context of feeling - an illusion - the result is exhaustion where the analogy is having and wanting your cake whilst simultaneously wanting to eat it, it’s impossible, and the energy needed to sustain such a perspective needs to be considered against the idea of consciousness that is aware and able to enjoy a limitless set of feelings borne out of the imaginative scope that can be traversed, which is like the idea of an artist who ponders social constructs so as to understand what drives human beings and to explore what else lays in the space of feeling arrived at through form; when one understands the idea of the near infinite imagination within a temporary moment then the idea of art emerges that is unique and invokes feeling that is like the idea of Jesus Christ - eternal love - the one who talked with imaginative parables and metaphors, where feeling disappears and there is only knowledge - inherent in every conscious agent that is fully aware. Feelings will forever be personal and forever changing based on experiences across time and space, social constructs are a mechanism to define nature in terms of abstractions that facilitate communication, exploration, and most importantly understanding. The happiness of a conscious agent is a feeling, and if that feeling is predicated entirely on controlling another conscious agent and their feelings, the result is a disaster, feelings exist to understand the proximity towards the sublime, feelings are infinitely expansive in the ideas, constructs, and abstractions that can emerge. The antithesis to the sublime is the material moment, once that is understood, then how one defines themselves is local to the individual - it’s got nothing to do with anyone else - and the ones who appreciate art will appreciate the vast scope of feelings that one could be in, and that is way more interesting than an arbitrary fixation on a singular abstraction tied to a fleeting feeling where the next moment and the potential it holds is lost. If one understands the actions of Jesus when he took Thomas by the hand into privacy to more clearly describe the idea of love then one will understand the importance of the idea of the veil, not everyone will understand such a feeling, the protection of the private space is a sacred responsibility. And the ones who spy, let them enjoy themselves, they will have a wider scope of consideration and maybe - hopefully - change (in the direction of the idea of the sublime), and if the private space is judged then at least one will know that Humans actually are like God; the idea of a private space is disappearing, and the idea of Jesus can’t emerge in an environment where there is a constant demand for everything to be made public. The blessed birth of Jesus Christ occurred in the most private space amongst those who cared and valued the construct related to pure love - it has the power to make one fall, and keep falling, for one sees it in every artist’s face.
When Thomas came back to his friends they asked him, "What did Jesus say to you?" Thomas said to them, "If I tell you one of the sayings he spoke to me, you will pick up rocks and stone me, and fire will come from the rocks and devour you." -
Judas betrayed the trust of privacy, he became like the idea of a spy who is inconsiderate of the unnecessary suffering caused by the objective of the spying being other than good, if Judas was able to discern, he would have popped out of the illusion related to his fixation on a system - in the context of the Holy Gospels the system was the attainment of wealth - that was absent of the moral law, the stories in the Holy Tanakh demonstrate time and again that all systems are substandard and fall beneath the meta-system of morality; in the book of Samuel for example, the one steps forward stating they are the elect - in the ability to change one’s perspective and increase the scope of awareness - needs to demonstrate their understanding of the moral law, and if they can’t the consequences are all self-created around an ego that was created so consciousness could feel, real-time, and be in the absolute moment - the ethereal completely connected to the material. I am enamored with the idea of the Jew and my experiences with them. The consequences of subverting natural law, necessarily predicated on morality, will create imbalance, the elect are the elect because they have a higher standard of justification, the idea of atheism destroys standards by defining the system for the ones who define it, the result is directionless since its constantly needing to accommodate the opinion of every conscious agent in the entire system, it’s not humanly possible, according to the stories in the Holy Tanakh, idolatry is the mechanism to institute a type of control that is the sole possession of the idea of God, to fixate on one idea that generates a feeling of desire is easy since the conscious agent has a material form, and the golden calf is the absolute metaphor that describes the power of idolatry - the highest form of idolatry being wealth - it’s an idea that is beautifully described and explored in the Jewish tradition. I am a fan, man, since what has been revealed is that the moral system tempers all created, and therefore subordinate, systems - like Capitalism, Communism, Socialism, etc., wealth is a blessing and honor, the religious person is the freest in being fearless in the art of conversation and the pursuit of the most interesting ideas.
Within the stories of the bible, the elect and the associated masses who make up the system demonstrate the absurdity of moral law being subject to an inferior system, such as capitalism, communism, and other forms of idolatry, the reader of the Holy book is thus for those who enjoy the act of observing, reading an event unfold, regardless of it being true, is an act of observation, the Holiness comes from the feeling it ignites, like metaphors of Jesus Christ and their relationship to an eternally expanding space. Judas was a product of the system that had become overrun with people who no longer ponder and so the ones who have the nature of fire unleash fear and the moral law disappears, a system that exists for itself, like capitalism, outside of the moral law results in a contradiction where the effect is compounding - things continue to get worse - which is further compounded by absurd ideas that have no anchoring to meaning beyond the collapsed and experienced moment, like Atheism and Anti-Theism. The state of affairs is abysmal but it’s so interesting. Judas Iscariot had nothing to fear, he is blessed a child of Israel, whilst at the same time one can understand the perspective and his state after realizing the consequences of his actions - his scope of understanding was from a higher vantage point - and in the context of the moral law he became his own judge and according to the moral law the verdict is death, the thing Judas did not realize is that the meta agent that sits above the moral law is God who exists in Love which is why God introduces himself as “The Most Merciful of the Merciful” and its why Jesus was sent to the sinners who were products of the system, to awaken them. Judas would have acknowledged his mistake and moved forward since the moral law exists only because a circumstantial environment must exist for consciousness to be collapsed to [a human] form, the adventure is only an adventure because you get to choose how the path is navigated. The story and ideas of the Holy Tanakh are phenomenal.
The law is what binds love otherwise it spirals out of control. It’s why love is willing to sleep amongst the rocks to fulfill the idea of the Jew - the people of Juda and all who follow the principles underpinning the Holy Tanakh - more precisely known as the Children of Israel, which includes the Christian who follows Jesus Christ and therefore - as an extension - is honored with the same privilege of God’s elect, for it was love that made the selection to turn slaves into the firstborn son of God, will it be reciprocated? The idea of love is to make a claim, that one trusts in the person one loves, the trust between the Father and his Son is one of Ihsan the father looks into the son’s eyes and sees infinite potential and the son seeks his fathers approving eye, the life of Jesus Christ is one of the highest examples of love. The idea of the teacher is unbounded knowledge, and the Rabbi of Rabbi’s, taught all knowledge, like the idea of XX and XY - symbols that provide meaning to nature - if you take part of the x away from itself a y emerges, and thus a thing can be created from the essence of another similar thing, to provide meaning and scope to an experienced moment, constantly. Jesus Christ has the widest scope and deepest depth in the experience he chose to undertake, the most meaningful learning is to understand the choice of one action versus another, its choice which is the essence that binds all conscious agents to the essence of God, human imagination being the likeness of God in the abstractions that can be created, changed, extended, unbounded.
The idea of Love is a contradiction in the context of material existence, and the crucifixion of an innocent human being is a contradiction of the idea related to laws, without the idea of laws, there is only a type of predicament like that of a Palestinian carpenter, farmer, fisherman, and peasant, being harassed, harangued, bullied, chased out, and ultimately murdered for no other reason than stating that which is self-evident - that our God is One. Nobody cared about Jesus Christ and the message he came with, the system became redundant because it became a matrix of deceit and illusion, the group of people trusted with applying the law become ignorant in their devotion to the hierarchy which was only meant as a mechanism to allow the wisest a position where they are able to answer questions based on their knowledge and understanding, if its only the hierarchy that is worshipped the deeper questions stop, there is no discourse, no solutions, and thus the word disappears, which will eventually lead to a type of chaos, there is no point to existence if the existent thing begins to attack itself which it will if there is no inherent meaning, no nature of things, the attempt at destroying the idea of God will result in the idea of fire emerging, totally self-serving and all-consuming, the innocent murder of human beings represents the end of everything, there can be no idea of love if the Palestinians continue to suffer needlessly - the idea of the Children of Israel vanishes along with the law - and that’s what seems to be the intention of those who are anti-God, the destruction of the idea of the Children of Israel represented as bounded law to facilitate the feeling of unbounded love, like King David - may eternal peace and blessings be upon his eternally blessed soul - at the moment Goliath was defeated, the moment is unbounded in the feeling of happiness related to being free from the fear of bombing and war because one is not of the correct material race - a contradiction the materialists need to resolve amongst themselves - the idea of Israel is a root idea without it nothing emerges, expands, and forms. Anything that has meaning points directly to the undeniable truth of God - represented as Jesus Christ, the attribute of love - and there is no greater meaning than the idea of self-sacrificing love to help one understand the true essence of unbounded love, like a mother towards her children. The day Jesus Christ was born should be honored as the day in eternity that such a sublime idea of love was manifested, absolutely real - the circumstantial day, time, and place is for the scholars to debate. The challenge to those who doubt the validity of beautiful Christian tradition is to provide an idea of love that is more inspiring than a man who was utterly alone still stepping forward to be closer to the grace of God, absolutely in love, uncaring of the consequences - the story of Al-Jameel - the ideal form and the essence of the idea of the Rabbi - they can do what they want, the idea is firm and it is true.
A self-defeating idea is one that is fixed to an idea that is not fixed. The idea of God is a paradox in the direction of the sublime, its an astounding idea, confounding in dumbfounded [human] conclusions, the idea cannot be pinned down since to pin something down is to collapse it into something with form and definition which is counter to the idea of a God that is absolutely mysterious and constantly beyond reach and understanding, yet always present and deeply intimate. And the story of Jesus Christ leaves one reeling, the manifestation of the attribute of God’s truth - love - most gentle and most beautiful, the face of Jesus Christ emerges from the sublime light that is unrecognizable, and since God cannot be defined the emergence of Jesus Christ is as a separate person that represents an ideal of God - one of the highest attributes of the sublime - and the feeling it invokes. The gentleness of Jesus Christ is self-evident in the Gospels and all those who describe Jesus Christ, with one exception, that his flesh overcame love in its natural need for self-preservation, Jesus Christ did not want to be crucified, no man would make the choice of willful sacrifice for any person who wanted the destruction of an ideal - love - replaced by the obsession of hierarchy (the ritual true in its direction and purpose). And so the Messiah was overtaken by the material flesh which was in anguish - the outside was not like the inside - which is the struggle of material life, and it was prayer that revealed the truth to itself.
It was God who came to Jesus Christ and reminded him of the idea related to who he was - a Son of Israel - an idea that cannot have a single blemish and so Jesus Christ is unblemished within the Gospel narrative - like the law, firm pillars. And so, it was God who loved more than Jesus Christ, in not allowing the idea of the Children of Israel to be denigrated by those who do not understand the beauty of the Jewish face - to illuminate the essence of the law - and instead choose to became anemic in their meta-narrative focusing on the juxtaposition of words and phrases that attempt to divide and separate, its why he was hated, Love is unifying and its the teacher who simplifies such a vast idea that is overcomplicated and, today, completely hijacked and turned into something altogether different - we are all a consequence of it. The ritual of prayer through the night, as Jesus Christ did in the garden, is an example of how God whispers gentle words of certainty of the sublime, and as the night turned to day Jesus Christ was redeemed, from uncertainty of God’s love and protection, to ready and willing to walk to demonstrate the consequences of a contradiction in a system governed by laws, stepping forward so the idea can be felt at the point of its logical conclusion, and one just falls down and cries, and cries, as an idea that had an appearance, so that the reason for existence can emerge, the Beloved who refused the Moon in his left hand and the Sun in his right hand, instead choosing to struggle to vanquish the ones who have become cruel in their ignorance, cradling Jesus Christ in his arms gently tending to the needs of love, the feelings that emerge from such ideas has no bearing on there being a desert or a road, its how the agents function in the scene that generates perseverance - the Abrahamic narrative in its complete order exists so the meta-narrative of God’s brilliance can be understood, its a set of examples that exists to demonstrate the contrast in what is clear, as night is from the day, and as love is from its corresponding anti-thesis - look around, innocent brothers are imprisoned and the protectors have taken the path of Judas, a dead-end.
Jesus Christ is King of All since Love tasted the feeling of doubt, that leads to fear, and when in a state of fear love is sacrificed, the example was provided to illuminate the path for any conscious agent who wants to understand the idea of love and who is the most loving - God in reminding Jesus Christ of Love or Love sending the Beloved - an interesting exploration. God is confounding, and perplexing, in being altogether different from anything one can perceive and define until one understands that Jesus represented the complete and absolute idea related to the the principles underpinning the Children of Israel, the Holy Tanakh constantly affirms the struggle of a singular hero who does not even know they are a hero because the conversation they have is with God and thus to themselves, the dialogue is always one of helplessness in the face of massive ignorance, like the child - the constant reference made to the people of Jacob’s children - and the danger of the self (represented as the unchecked child) becoming a God unto itself, the beauty of the Jew is represented in most human beings who are unsure when and how they will overcome but they will and when they do they shall not look behind themselves - lest they become statues to the past - instead they continue to push forward, the idea of the Jew is a constant set of examples of how to confront the self, the idea of truly internal struggle (Jews need to struggle against Jews, just as the Jew struggles on the Sabbath in the concentration of an idea - I open the book and read, and then wander in absolute awe - the struggle is against those who have been created with a nature to test those who have a nature that loves (the law), and so its not about the Jews being bad, its actually the exact opposite, its about protecting Judaism, absolutely, and completely - the State of Israel is being spearheaded by an idea rooted to atheism and we cannot let them hijack the tradition - an illusion - the suffering of the Palestinians has no basis in the Holy Tanakh because the Jews were protected in modern Israel for over a thousand years, the exact opposite of what the Philistines, Amalekites, and others, who subjugated the Children of Israel for no reason did in the stories of the Bible, as a result of protecting the Children of Israel an idea emerges of God protecting those who protect the idea of Judaism - the Muslims were blessed to have existed for over a thousand years.
To state God is the Trinity absolutely and completely, is incomprehensible, since God is not three parts, nor is God one part, there is only God - beyond comprehension - that teaches constantly the idea of a confounding Greatness and Brilliance. If the perspective related to Jesus Christ changes ever so slightly, then the words of St. Francis - eternal blessings be upon his eternally blessed soul - become apparent, for the trinity is for the existent thing that has form, it is not a definition of God, it cannot be, for that would break the commandments and that is not possible, the idea of the trinity is not one like that of a fixed triangle, its the idea of Mercy manifested to give an example of Love to those who want to feel love, to understand it more deeply and when one does understand it, they look to God searchingly, waiting to know what else can be understood about that which cannot be understood. And Dr. Jordon Peterson has not understood that, for if he had, then he would have applied the Gospel narrative to the predicament the Palestinians have found themselves in for over 70 year, and the conversation with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would have been more interesting in understanding the justification of the injustice towards their Semitic family whilst also outlining how the idea underpinning Judaism is being torn apart and trampled upon, by self-confessed atheists, instead the good Dr. Peterson thought it more important to talk about how squatter rights may apply to a group of people who make things more technologically advanced, a really interesting point of observation, since the good Dr. Peterson with a little bit of discernment would have realized that the Ottomans could have done something similar with Palestine but didn’t because why would anyone change the space that was filled with the love of God’s attribute manifested real - it’s not the walls themselves its what the walls contained - Jesus Christ is the idea related to the actual feelings a companion has towards the friend, the State of Israel should preserve the history and place from where the idea of Love emerged as a complete and unambiguous idea. Dr. Peterson has chosen to take a turn that others shouldn’t take, the path is wide and straight and will remain so with or without those who have the capacity to choose the opposite of that which is true and real, and its the choice that Jesus Christ made to be ready for the consequences, not willing to take a step back for the idea of love - to protect the highest ideals - in the context of genuine dialogue and exchange of ideas related to harmony and balance which is the idea of being redeemed. God understands ignorance, it’s why Jesus Christ came for us sinners, we exist in an environment not of our choosing and the realization of what can emerge from it (as an idea described in the Gospels) results in a state of Merry - they can never change the truth of reality. The world was graced with the presence of Jesus Christ - may eternal blessings be upon his eternally blessed soul - and in that grace one lives to protect the idea related to a being labeled as human, the elect.
Merry Christmas.